What is one to do when the model railroad layout is basically finished? Well, in truth, there is no such thing as a finished model railroad layout. At least this is true for the one who builds the layout. My current layout might be considered finished by some people but there is always more that can be done. Such things can be small or large. Maybe add some people; maybe add some scale size trash; build a fence; add some more trees; add more lights to buildings; on and on, really.
While more light in buildings would be a good thing, that is not what I have in mind. You see, I have a fondness for passenger trains. I have these:
Santa Fe - an 11 car San Francisco Chief
C&NW - a 4 car commuter train
C&NW - a 5 car streamliner (needs a diner)
C&NW - a 10 car heavyweight train
GN - a 3 car Empire Builder (adding a new car each month until 10 cars)
Amtrak - an 11 car Superliner
There are also some older ones that are "retired" because they are from older and now inferior models:
UP - 12 car "City" train (actually 18 cars at one time!)
Santa Fe - 10 car Grand Canyon Limited
CB&Q/D&RGW/WP - 11 car California Zephyr
Santa Fe - 10 car Super Chief
The layout isn't nearly big enough to have all these trains on it so some of them rest peacefully in their boxes.
What I am thinking about is to have someplace to park them where they can be seen as if in a large passenger station. This would also enable me to trade off trains periodically without having to box or unbox them.
But, how will I do it - that is the question.
Friday, October 27, 2006
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Yet Another Load of Coal on the Joint Line
That Union Pacific train I wrote about in my previous posting had 6 locomotives each with 4400 horsepower for a total of 26,400. This is the typical configuration for UP coal trains going south on the Joint Line south of Denver.
Today, I got a nice photo of a southbound BNSF coal train in the exact same place as the UP train - the far south end of the dam at Chatfield State Park. BNSF has a different approach to coal train motive power for the Joint Line. They typically place two locomotives up from and 2 at the end of the train pushing.

This train had this configuration:
At the front of the train:
9954 - SD70MAC built in 1998
9514 - SD70MAC built in 1995
At the rear of the train:
9613 - SD70MAC built in 1995
9331 - SD70ACe built in 2006
The last one, the SD70ACe, is quite new. My picture of it did not turn out well so here is a link to a nice clean one.
The SD70MACs have 4000 horsepower and the SD70ACe has 4300. So this train had a total of 16,300 horsepower - quite a bit less than what UP uses for similar trains.
Notice that these two engines do not have the same paint scheme. The 9514 is one of the earlier SD70MACs that Burlington Northern acquired before its merger with the Santa Fe. The paint scheme was called the "Executive Scheme" because BN had an executive passenger train and the special engines that pulled it were painted similarly to these SD70MACs. Here is a picture of one of those at the Illinois Railway Museum.
The 9954 is a newer SD70MAC. It has one of the "heritage" schemes that BNSF came up with. It combines colors from some of the predecessor railroads such as Santa Fe and Great Northern.
Today, I got a nice photo of a southbound BNSF coal train in the exact same place as the UP train - the far south end of the dam at Chatfield State Park. BNSF has a different approach to coal train motive power for the Joint Line. They typically place two locomotives up from and 2 at the end of the train pushing.

This train had this configuration:
At the front of the train:
9954 - SD70MAC built in 1998
9514 - SD70MAC built in 1995
At the rear of the train:
9613 - SD70MAC built in 1995
9331 - SD70ACe built in 2006
The last one, the SD70ACe, is quite new. My picture of it did not turn out well so here is a link to a nice clean one.
The SD70MACs have 4000 horsepower and the SD70ACe has 4300. So this train had a total of 16,300 horsepower - quite a bit less than what UP uses for similar trains.
Notice that these two engines do not have the same paint scheme. The 9514 is one of the earlier SD70MACs that Burlington Northern acquired before its merger with the Santa Fe. The paint scheme was called the "Executive Scheme" because BN had an executive passenger train and the special engines that pulled it were painted similarly to these SD70MACs. Here is a picture of one of those at the Illinois Railway Museum.
The 9954 is a newer SD70MAC. It has one of the "heritage" schemes that BNSF came up with. It combines colors from some of the predecessor railroads such as Santa Fe and Great Northern.
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Another Load of Coal Going South
Here is a nice coal train heading south on the joint line just west of Highlands Ranch. It is a Union Pacific train led by UP 6007. This load of coal most likely originated in northwestern Colorado or it could have come from Wyoming.
At the front of the train were similar engines but different models:
6007 - AC44CCTE built in 2003
6485 - AC4400CW built in 2000
In the middle of the train was:
6882 - AC4400CW built in 1995
5939 - AC44CCTE built in 2003
6414 - AC4400CW built in 1995 - ex SP 368
At the end of the train was:
6582 - AC4400CW built in 1997
Union Pacific has about 520 AC44CCTEs and about 850 AC4400CWs. UPs most common model is the SD70M - with over 1400 of them.
Here is the 6007:
At the front of the train were similar engines but different models:
6007 - AC44CCTE built in 2003
6485 - AC4400CW built in 2000
In the middle of the train was:
6882 - AC4400CW built in 1995
5939 - AC44CCTE built in 2003
6414 - AC4400CW built in 1995 - ex SP 368
At the end of the train was:
6582 - AC4400CW built in 1997
Union Pacific has about 520 AC44CCTEs and about 850 AC4400CWs. UPs most common model is the SD70M - with over 1400 of them.
Here is the 6007:

Saturday, October 14, 2006
Celebrity Engines
The Union Pacific Railroad has painted 6 locomotives in special paint schemes to honor some of the railroads the UP has gobbled up over the past 25 years or so. I saw my first one in person today. It is UP 1989 painted to honor the Denver and Rio Grande Western whose track runs between Denver and Pueblo as part of the joint line. It runs about a mile from my home and this is where I saw the 1989 today as the 4th unit of 4 on a northbound train.
The set of locomotives are all model SD70ACe built in 2005 and 2006. They are:
UP 1982 - for the Missouri Pacific
UP 1983 - for the Western Pacific
UP 1988 - for the Missouri - Kansas - Texas
UP 1989 - for the Denver and Rio Grande Western
UP 1995 - for the Chicago and North Western
UP 1996 - for the Southern Pacific
You can see pictures of them here.
Let me know which one you like best.
I would like to see one commemorating the Union Pacific itself.
The set of locomotives are all model SD70ACe built in 2005 and 2006. They are:
UP 1982 - for the Missouri Pacific
UP 1983 - for the Western Pacific
UP 1988 - for the Missouri - Kansas - Texas
UP 1989 - for the Denver and Rio Grande Western
UP 1995 - for the Chicago and North Western
UP 1996 - for the Southern Pacific
You can see pictures of them here.
Let me know which one you like best.
I would like to see one commemorating the Union Pacific itself.
Saturday, September 30, 2006
A Couple of Train Sightings
While on my bike ride in Chatfield State Park today, I rode the length of the dam. As I began my traversal of the dam, I saw a stopped northbound empty coal train and wondered if it would block my route at the other end of the dam. As I rode on, the train began to move. However, there was another train right behind it and not all that far behind it. I always thought it was unusual to see two trains on the same track so close together. The first northbound train was another of the many BNSF coal trains that utilize the Joint Line. The train behind it turned out to be rather unusual. It was just 7 engines – five SD70MACs and a couple of AC4400CWs.
While all this was going by, a loaded southbound coal train came along on the other track. It consisted mostly of brand new CEFX coal hoppers. The build dates on them were 09-2006. Here is a picture of one.

One of the trailing locomotives was a fairly new SD70Ace:

I really like this picture showing most of the train.

All these photos were taken at the southernmost end of the Chatfield dam.
While all this was going by, a loaded southbound coal train came along on the other track. It consisted mostly of brand new CEFX coal hoppers. The build dates on them were 09-2006. Here is a picture of one.

One of the trailing locomotives was a fairly new SD70Ace:

I really like this picture showing most of the train.

All these photos were taken at the southernmost end of the Chatfield dam.
Monday, September 25, 2006
Moffat Tunnel Area – 9/24/2006
My wife and I spent a good part of the afternoon exploring some semi-back roads up in the mountains looking for some fall colors including the road to the Moffat Tunnel. We found some good colors and even saw a train exit the tunnel. Right after it completed its emergence, the big ventilation system came on to eliminate the fumes from the tunnel. The fumes from one train can be considerable.

The fans are really noisy and when they start; they sound like a jet airplane starting its engines. They run for about 20 minutes and then shutoff. They railroad dispatcher does not let another train through the tunnel until the ventilation is complete.
We had in mind the possibility of doing a little hike up the trail that goes behind the tunnel but it was way too snowy and muddy for that. However, I did go up the trail a little ways to one of the many "restrooms" that are available. Here I am returning.

One of the interesting things about this area is the old railroad route over Rollins Pass, also known as Corona Pass. This sign is at the beginning of this road.

And this is what the road looks like. We didn’t go up this time but I have been up there on my bicycle.

The fans are really noisy and when they start; they sound like a jet airplane starting its engines. They run for about 20 minutes and then shutoff. They railroad dispatcher does not let another train through the tunnel until the ventilation is complete.
We had in mind the possibility of doing a little hike up the trail that goes behind the tunnel but it was way too snowy and muddy for that. However, I did go up the trail a little ways to one of the many "restrooms" that are available. Here I am returning.

One of the interesting things about this area is the old railroad route over Rollins Pass, also known as Corona Pass. This sign is at the beginning of this road.

And this is what the road looks like. We didn’t go up this time but I have been up there on my bicycle.

Friday, September 22, 2006
The Texas Zephyr
The Texas Zephyr was a train that ran between Denver, Colorado and Fort Worth, Texas. I have driven between these two cities a number of times and to me, being a railfan, I enjoy the fact that US 287 follows the BNSF line much of the way. I wish I could take the train, though. This is a route not included on Amtrak's map. Before being part of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe, the line was part of Burlington Northern. Before that, it was two different but related railroads. The Fort Worth and Denver and the Colorado and Southern Railways came together at Texline, Texas which is right on the New Mexico border in far northwestern Texas. The town was started by the FW&D railway and today is the home to about 500 residents. From Texline to Fort Worth, it was the FW&D. From Texline to Denver, it was the C&S except for the part where it shared the tracks with the Santa Fe and Rio Grande railroads.
The route was the home to an overnight passenger train called the Texas Zephyr. In 1950, it left Denver at 12:30 pm and arrived in Fort Worth at 6 am the next morning. Coming back, it left Fort Worth at 3 pm and arrived in Denver at 7:30 the next morning.
Equipment was the following for these daily trains:
4000 HP diesel locomotive (2 E5’s, I believe)
Reclining-seat chair cars
Dining-lounge
Special streamline Pullmans with drawing rooms, compartments, bedrooms, and sections.
All equipment was air-conditioned
No Extra Fare
The route was the home to an overnight passenger train called the Texas Zephyr. In 1950, it left Denver at 12:30 pm and arrived in Fort Worth at 6 am the next morning. Coming back, it left Fort Worth at 3 pm and arrived in Denver at 7:30 the next morning.
Equipment was the following for these daily trains:
4000 HP diesel locomotive (2 E5’s, I believe)
Reclining-seat chair cars
Dining-lounge
Special streamline Pullmans with drawing rooms, compartments, bedrooms, and sections.
All equipment was air-conditioned
No Extra Fare
Friday, September 15, 2006
When I Was Workin’ On the Railroad – Part VI, Leaving
It had always been my intention to return to college to earn a master’s degree. I had in mind an MBA and I ended up attending the University of Wisconsin starting in February, 1982. This was good plan, I thought, because the degree could be achieved in one calendar year since I had already earned a BBA at the University of Michigan.
In January of 1982, I reluctantly gave my notice and then my C&NW career came to an end after two fun years. You know, not everyone can say that their job is fun. I have had a number of software jobs since then and I would not call all of them fun.
While at the University of Wisconsin, I participated in the business school’s on-campus interviews. During this same time, I contacted the C&NW again to inquire about the possibility of returning. I was turned down but not because of my qualifications. Sadly, they had a hiring freeze on at the time so it was not to be. Happily, however, I did get a good job through an on campus interview with Texas Instruments and that began a significant turning point in my career and life. But that’s another story.
Skipping ahead to about 2002, I mentioned to an acquaintance in Colorado where I now live that I had once worked for a railroad in Chicago that didn’t exist anymore because it had become part of the Union Pacific. He said that he had a good friend who worked for the UP in Omaha who had once worked for the C&NW in Chicago. I immediately thought, “How many times had I heard this sort of thing?” He told me the fellow’s name and sure enough, it was someone I had known when I had worked there. In fact, it was the same person I had ridden with in the freight train that I wrote about in my previous post!
I ended up contacting Dean via email and we shared a few memories about people we had worked with way back when. Dean still worked for UP and I suppose he still does though I have lost contact with him once again and do not really know.
In January of 1982, I reluctantly gave my notice and then my C&NW career came to an end after two fun years. You know, not everyone can say that their job is fun. I have had a number of software jobs since then and I would not call all of them fun.
While at the University of Wisconsin, I participated in the business school’s on-campus interviews. During this same time, I contacted the C&NW again to inquire about the possibility of returning. I was turned down but not because of my qualifications. Sadly, they had a hiring freeze on at the time so it was not to be. Happily, however, I did get a good job through an on campus interview with Texas Instruments and that began a significant turning point in my career and life. But that’s another story.
Skipping ahead to about 2002, I mentioned to an acquaintance in Colorado where I now live that I had once worked for a railroad in Chicago that didn’t exist anymore because it had become part of the Union Pacific. He said that he had a good friend who worked for the UP in Omaha who had once worked for the C&NW in Chicago. I immediately thought, “How many times had I heard this sort of thing?” He told me the fellow’s name and sure enough, it was someone I had known when I had worked there. In fact, it was the same person I had ridden with in the freight train that I wrote about in my previous post!
I ended up contacting Dean via email and we shared a few memories about people we had worked with way back when. Dean still worked for UP and I suppose he still does though I have lost contact with him once again and do not really know.
Tuesday, September 12, 2006
When I Was Workin’ On the Railroad – Part V, The Ride to Clinton
During my time working on the Locomotive Utilization System at the C&NW, the business analyst that we were working with found out that some of us had not had the opportunity to "go out on the road". He arranged for my partner and me to ride on a freight train from Proviso out to Clinton and back. This was a ride in the lead or second locomotive for about 120 miles one way.
We met the train at about 5:30 that morning at the west end of Proviso. The train was just about ready to go when we arrived. My partner, Dean and I were to trade between the lead locomotive and the second locomotive which was facing backwards. If I remember correctly the lead loco was a C&NW SD40-2 and the second one was a Union Pacific SD40-2 with a long "snoot" nose.
The ride out was the most eventful and I remember the most about it. Dean and I traded between the locos while the train was still moving although relatively slowly. We had been notified of a derailment that occurred the day before somewhere along the mainline. At some point we moved as fast as 79 mph (which was 4 over the limit). The derailment had been cleaned up but the site was obvious and we had to go through that stretch fairly slowly.
At one point we had a very interesting experience. We were approaching an intersection with a road at perhaps 50 mph. We were on the left hand track of two tracks. On the right hand track was a stopped freight train facing the same direction as our train. It was stopped for a signal short of the road crossing. Also on that same track was another freight train facing the opposite direction. It was stopped for a signal short of the road crossing on the other side. The two stopped trains were facing each other with the road crossing between them. We were moving along on the empty track. There were crossovers that one of the two stopped trains would use to cross over to the other track after we went by.
The interesting part of this passage was the behavior of the people in a car at the crossing as well as that of the experienced train crew. A man and a woman were in a station wagon and had approached the crossing. The gates were not yet down for our approach. The man driving the car slowed down to observe the two stopped trains to make sure they were not moving. He didn't initially spot us coming. When the gate came down for our approach, it came right down on the hood of the station wagon! The engineer saw this and pulled the horn and then hit the floor of the locomotive. So does the head end brakeman.
I was sitting in the left hand seat at the front of the locomotive (engineer on the right, brakeman behind) and I saw the crew hit the deck but I just sat there and I saw what the people in the car did. The woman in the passenger seat got out of the car and started running down the road away from the tracks. Then the man was able to back the car out of harms way. Then we went by the crossing and that was it. No accident.
The engineer thought I was dumb to not have hit the deck along with him. He said that you never know what part of a car might fly up right into the cab – maybe the hood of the car. I told him that I saw that the car driver was obviously going to get out of the way and therefore did not see the need to do anything.
The other thing that stands out about this trip was just how noisy it was in the cab. I don’t think they are quite as noisy these days but there was quite a racket in this loco. Besides the engine itself, there was the radio, hissing brakes, warning bells, horn, and the loud talking engineer who never stopped talking.
While we were in Clinton, Iowa, we met with some people and for the most part, hung around for a while not doing much. I remember that our host spotted what he thought was a problem with one of the cars on a coal train that was slowly passing by. He thought it was "off center". Freight cars are not attached to their trucks. They just have a pin that sits in a hole in the top of the truck – not unlike model train cars except unlike models, there is no screw attaching the car to the truck. If a car is off center, the pin has come out of its hole but is otherwise still sitting on the truck. The next event would be a derailment. He immediately entered one of the buildings to notify someone and he got the train to stop very quickly. Fortunately, it turned out to be a false alarm.
I don’t recall what was on the train going out to Clinton but I believe we caught one of the Falcons going back. The Falcon trains were the hotshot intermodal trains that the C&NW ran to and from the UP in Nebraska. Its destination was Wood Street in Chicago. This was a fast train as well and it doesn't usually stop at Proviso where our cars were parked. It didn't quite stop for us either but it did slow down to about 10 mph for us to hop off at the nearby Berkeley commuter station stop. It was a short walk through the weeds to get back into Proviso where our cars were parked.
The whole day took about 12 hours.
We met the train at about 5:30 that morning at the west end of Proviso. The train was just about ready to go when we arrived. My partner, Dean and I were to trade between the lead locomotive and the second locomotive which was facing backwards. If I remember correctly the lead loco was a C&NW SD40-2 and the second one was a Union Pacific SD40-2 with a long "snoot" nose.
The ride out was the most eventful and I remember the most about it. Dean and I traded between the locos while the train was still moving although relatively slowly. We had been notified of a derailment that occurred the day before somewhere along the mainline. At some point we moved as fast as 79 mph (which was 4 over the limit). The derailment had been cleaned up but the site was obvious and we had to go through that stretch fairly slowly.
At one point we had a very interesting experience. We were approaching an intersection with a road at perhaps 50 mph. We were on the left hand track of two tracks. On the right hand track was a stopped freight train facing the same direction as our train. It was stopped for a signal short of the road crossing. Also on that same track was another freight train facing the opposite direction. It was stopped for a signal short of the road crossing on the other side. The two stopped trains were facing each other with the road crossing between them. We were moving along on the empty track. There were crossovers that one of the two stopped trains would use to cross over to the other track after we went by.
The interesting part of this passage was the behavior of the people in a car at the crossing as well as that of the experienced train crew. A man and a woman were in a station wagon and had approached the crossing. The gates were not yet down for our approach. The man driving the car slowed down to observe the two stopped trains to make sure they were not moving. He didn't initially spot us coming. When the gate came down for our approach, it came right down on the hood of the station wagon! The engineer saw this and pulled the horn and then hit the floor of the locomotive. So does the head end brakeman.
I was sitting in the left hand seat at the front of the locomotive (engineer on the right, brakeman behind) and I saw the crew hit the deck but I just sat there and I saw what the people in the car did. The woman in the passenger seat got out of the car and started running down the road away from the tracks. Then the man was able to back the car out of harms way. Then we went by the crossing and that was it. No accident.
The engineer thought I was dumb to not have hit the deck along with him. He said that you never know what part of a car might fly up right into the cab – maybe the hood of the car. I told him that I saw that the car driver was obviously going to get out of the way and therefore did not see the need to do anything.
The other thing that stands out about this trip was just how noisy it was in the cab. I don’t think they are quite as noisy these days but there was quite a racket in this loco. Besides the engine itself, there was the radio, hissing brakes, warning bells, horn, and the loud talking engineer who never stopped talking.
While we were in Clinton, Iowa, we met with some people and for the most part, hung around for a while not doing much. I remember that our host spotted what he thought was a problem with one of the cars on a coal train that was slowly passing by. He thought it was "off center". Freight cars are not attached to their trucks. They just have a pin that sits in a hole in the top of the truck – not unlike model train cars except unlike models, there is no screw attaching the car to the truck. If a car is off center, the pin has come out of its hole but is otherwise still sitting on the truck. The next event would be a derailment. He immediately entered one of the buildings to notify someone and he got the train to stop very quickly. Fortunately, it turned out to be a false alarm.
I don’t recall what was on the train going out to Clinton but I believe we caught one of the Falcons going back. The Falcon trains were the hotshot intermodal trains that the C&NW ran to and from the UP in Nebraska. Its destination was Wood Street in Chicago. This was a fast train as well and it doesn't usually stop at Proviso where our cars were parked. It didn't quite stop for us either but it did slow down to about 10 mph for us to hop off at the nearby Berkeley commuter station stop. It was a short walk through the weeds to get back into Proviso where our cars were parked.
The whole day took about 12 hours.
Saturday, September 09, 2006
When I Was Workin’ On the Railroad – Part IV, Locomotive Utilization
The most interesting computer system I worked on at the C&NW was the Locomotive Utilization (LU) System. Unfortunately for me, I never saw it to its completion because I left the company to return to school full time to earn a Master’s Degree.
I was one of the key designers and implementers. The railroad was very interested in maximizing the usage of their locomotives. Given the expense of these assets, it was foolish and expensive for the railroad to have idle locomotives. This would even lead to the purchase of more locomotives and such purchases add up very quickly considering that they cost around a million bucks even back in 1981.
The LU System had built into it a roster of the C&NW locomotives as well as locomotives from other railroads that might run on C&NW rails – such as those of the Union Pacific Railroad. The system also knew of all of the locations on every bit of the railroad along with mileage from certain other locations. Users of this system would enter in information about what locos were on what trains and when they went by these various locations. They could use this system to help maximize the locos usage. It also kept track of maintenance requirements so that they could make sure locos got to their maintenance points on time.
For locos of other railroads, the system kept track of horsepower miles and horsepower hours. If a 3000 horsepower locomotive went one mile, that was 3000 horsepower miles and if a 3000 horsepower locomotive spent an hour on the C&NW, that was 3000 horsepower hours. It was these measurements that were used by the railroads to repay each other for pooled locomotives. Every time a UP loco spent time and miles on the C&NW, a similar C&NW loco was supposed to spend the same amount of time and miles on the UP. If an imbalance occurred, one railroad would have to pay the other in cash.
About 20 years later, in about the year 2001, I met a fellow who learned of my interest in railroads. He told me that he knew someone who worked for the Union Pacific Railroad in Omaha. I told him that I worked for the C&NW back in 1980 and 1981. He said that his friend had worked for the C&NW also during that timeframe. It turns out that I actually worked with this person in Chicago. I thought the odds were against that.
I contacted him via email and he informed me among other things that the LU system had worked very well in its day. It’s long gone now as is the C&NW as an independent railroad. It’s part of Union Pacific and there is no doubt a new generation of computer system for the tracking and utilization of locomotives.
I was one of the key designers and implementers. The railroad was very interested in maximizing the usage of their locomotives. Given the expense of these assets, it was foolish and expensive for the railroad to have idle locomotives. This would even lead to the purchase of more locomotives and such purchases add up very quickly considering that they cost around a million bucks even back in 1981.
The LU System had built into it a roster of the C&NW locomotives as well as locomotives from other railroads that might run on C&NW rails – such as those of the Union Pacific Railroad. The system also knew of all of the locations on every bit of the railroad along with mileage from certain other locations. Users of this system would enter in information about what locos were on what trains and when they went by these various locations. They could use this system to help maximize the locos usage. It also kept track of maintenance requirements so that they could make sure locos got to their maintenance points on time.
For locos of other railroads, the system kept track of horsepower miles and horsepower hours. If a 3000 horsepower locomotive went one mile, that was 3000 horsepower miles and if a 3000 horsepower locomotive spent an hour on the C&NW, that was 3000 horsepower hours. It was these measurements that were used by the railroads to repay each other for pooled locomotives. Every time a UP loco spent time and miles on the C&NW, a similar C&NW loco was supposed to spend the same amount of time and miles on the UP. If an imbalance occurred, one railroad would have to pay the other in cash.
About 20 years later, in about the year 2001, I met a fellow who learned of my interest in railroads. He told me that he knew someone who worked for the Union Pacific Railroad in Omaha. I told him that I worked for the C&NW back in 1980 and 1981. He said that his friend had worked for the C&NW also during that timeframe. It turns out that I actually worked with this person in Chicago. I thought the odds were against that.
I contacted him via email and he informed me among other things that the LU system had worked very well in its day. It’s long gone now as is the C&NW as an independent railroad. It’s part of Union Pacific and there is no doubt a new generation of computer system for the tracking and utilization of locomotives.
Thursday, September 07, 2006
When I Was Workin’ On the Railroad – Part III, Warehousing and Intemodal
My first assignment with the C&NW was to be part of a team that developed software for a warehouse inventory system. The railroad had a number of warehouses scattered about the country that stored equipment and materials for maintaining the railroad itself. Think hardware like spikes, rail, sledge hammers, as well as many more items for doing railroad business. This was a great way to get my feet wet with COBOL and Assembly language programming. And this was the first of a series of systems based on this same software architecture.
The second such system that I worked on was a system that kept track of trailers and containers as they arrived and departed from C&NW’s Wood Street intermodal yard (later known as Global I). Every time a truck with a trailer or container entered or exited the yard via railroad or concrete, an entry was made in this system by a clerk. Customers were charged for the time the railroad owned trailers and containers were in use off the railroad premises. So the system kept track of the time.
One of the problems with this system was that there was a significant number of errors in the manual data entry process. Numbers were transposed, for instance. This would result in trailers appearing to leave the yard and never return.
I remember when we first installed the intermodal system in 1980, we had to be at the yard where it was used around the clock. Members of the development team worked in shifts. I had the midnight to 8 am shift. It was a smooth installation so we didn’t have to keep this up very long.
Both of these systems were fun to develop and got my software career off to a great start.
The second such system that I worked on was a system that kept track of trailers and containers as they arrived and departed from C&NW’s Wood Street intermodal yard (later known as Global I). Every time a truck with a trailer or container entered or exited the yard via railroad or concrete, an entry was made in this system by a clerk. Customers were charged for the time the railroad owned trailers and containers were in use off the railroad premises. So the system kept track of the time.
One of the problems with this system was that there was a significant number of errors in the manual data entry process. Numbers were transposed, for instance. This would result in trailers appearing to leave the yard and never return.
I remember when we first installed the intermodal system in 1980, we had to be at the yard where it was used around the clock. Members of the development team worked in shifts. I had the midnight to 8 am shift. It was a smooth installation so we didn’t have to keep this up very long.
Both of these systems were fun to develop and got my software career off to a great start.
Wednesday, September 06, 2006
When I Was Workin’ On the Railroad – Part II, Location
When I started working for the C&NW, I worked in the Riverside Plaza Building in downtown Chicago. This was the 400 West Madison Street headquarters address for the C&NW. In the next block west was the C&NW Terminal with an address of 500 West Madison.
The Riverside Plaza Building was completed in 1929 as the Chicago Daily News Building. The newspaper moved to another location sometime in the 60’s or 70’s. This building was the first commercial building erected on air rights over the railroad tracks that led to Union Station from the north. One of the interesting things about this building is that it included a system to carry smoke from steam engines up through the roof.
The building is 26 stories and I worked on the 4th or 5th floor. I remember that they had piped in music playing all day. It got more lively after lunch to help keep people who had large lunches alert and active. Here is a link to information about the building.
Another interesting thing about this building was the mural painted on the ceiling in one of the main hallways. According to some web sites I found, the building originally had an outstanding ceiling mural by John W. Norton, a noted Chicago artist that showed the process of producing a newspaper. It was removed in 1993 for restoration but is currently still in storage because initial restoration bids were deemed too high by the building's management company. It was commissioned for the original tenant, the Chicago Daily News. It was dominated by diagonal lines, and divided into three sections: Gathering the News, Printing the News, & Transporting the News. The mural was there when I worked in the building and was 180x18-feet in size.
Close to the end of my 2 year tenure with the railroad, the offices were moved to a building two blocks north. The building was named One Northwestern Center during the time the C&NW had its offices there. It was one of two nearly identical 18 story buildings that sit next to each other along the Chicago River. They were originally known as the Butler Brothers Buildings. There is a 1928 photo available via this web site. The buildings were completed in 1913. The C&NW occupied the northernmost of the two buildings which is on the right in the photo. I worked on the 3rd or 4th floor.
Both buildings were quite convenient for me. I commuted on the C&NW to the C&NW terminal across the street. I did not even have to go outside to get to the Riverside Plaza Building and I only had to cross the street for the other building.
The Riverside Plaza Building was completed in 1929 as the Chicago Daily News Building. The newspaper moved to another location sometime in the 60’s or 70’s. This building was the first commercial building erected on air rights over the railroad tracks that led to Union Station from the north. One of the interesting things about this building is that it included a system to carry smoke from steam engines up through the roof.
The building is 26 stories and I worked on the 4th or 5th floor. I remember that they had piped in music playing all day. It got more lively after lunch to help keep people who had large lunches alert and active. Here is a link to information about the building.
Another interesting thing about this building was the mural painted on the ceiling in one of the main hallways. According to some web sites I found, the building originally had an outstanding ceiling mural by John W. Norton, a noted Chicago artist that showed the process of producing a newspaper. It was removed in 1993 for restoration but is currently still in storage because initial restoration bids were deemed too high by the building's management company. It was commissioned for the original tenant, the Chicago Daily News. It was dominated by diagonal lines, and divided into three sections: Gathering the News, Printing the News, & Transporting the News. The mural was there when I worked in the building and was 180x18-feet in size.
Close to the end of my 2 year tenure with the railroad, the offices were moved to a building two blocks north. The building was named One Northwestern Center during the time the C&NW had its offices there. It was one of two nearly identical 18 story buildings that sit next to each other along the Chicago River. They were originally known as the Butler Brothers Buildings. There is a 1928 photo available via this web site. The buildings were completed in 1913. The C&NW occupied the northernmost of the two buildings which is on the right in the photo. I worked on the 3rd or 4th floor.
Both buildings were quite convenient for me. I commuted on the C&NW to the C&NW terminal across the street. I did not even have to go outside to get to the Riverside Plaza Building and I only had to cross the street for the other building.
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
When I Was Workin’ On the Railroad – Part I, Getting the Job
I graduated from the University of Michigan in December of 1979 with a business degree. My interest was "Information Systems". That was the business school term for software design and programming. I enjoyed it and still work in this area. I failed to get a job through the university’s on-campus interview system. It seems that most of the recruiters who came to the business school were interested in accounting and finance majors which I was not interested in. So, I was out of school with no job and living back with my parents in the Chicago area.
After the holidays were over, my father helped me craft some letters to use in seeking a job to begin my career in software. Since I had a longstanding interest in railroads, I thought I would try to get a software job with one. In 1980, there were still a number of railroads headquartered in Chicago. Most notable were the Santa Fe, the Illinois Central Gulf, and the Chicago and North Western. I sent my letters to all three and threw in the Missouri Pacific for good measure. They were in Saint Louis.
I never heard from the Santa Fe or the MoPac but I did get interviews with ICG and the C&NW. I don’t recall much about the ICG interview but I do remember showing the interviewer some COBOL code that I had written in school. I didn’t get an offer from them.
The C&NW interview went well though I don’t remember much about it, either. I ended up getting an offer for $16,500 per year which I gladly accepted. It was my first professional job.
The hiring process was interesting. In order to avoid any problems in their hiring practices, they put every new employee through certain tests. One of them was an extremely easy math test though it might have been harder for some people. They also gave me a vision test. This is important for personnel who operate the trains. It included a color blindness test. This is when I first found out that I was color blind (at age 22)! This test is also important for train personnel. They said that it was unimportant for me since it was unlikely that I would be operating any trains. They also took fingerprints.
So I started for C&NW the first part of February, 1980 at 400 West Madison Street in Chicago.
After the holidays were over, my father helped me craft some letters to use in seeking a job to begin my career in software. Since I had a longstanding interest in railroads, I thought I would try to get a software job with one. In 1980, there were still a number of railroads headquartered in Chicago. Most notable were the Santa Fe, the Illinois Central Gulf, and the Chicago and North Western. I sent my letters to all three and threw in the Missouri Pacific for good measure. They were in Saint Louis.
I never heard from the Santa Fe or the MoPac but I did get interviews with ICG and the C&NW. I don’t recall much about the ICG interview but I do remember showing the interviewer some COBOL code that I had written in school. I didn’t get an offer from them.
The C&NW interview went well though I don’t remember much about it, either. I ended up getting an offer for $16,500 per year which I gladly accepted. It was my first professional job.
The hiring process was interesting. In order to avoid any problems in their hiring practices, they put every new employee through certain tests. One of them was an extremely easy math test though it might have been harder for some people. They also gave me a vision test. This is important for personnel who operate the trains. It included a color blindness test. This is when I first found out that I was color blind (at age 22)! This test is also important for train personnel. They said that it was unimportant for me since it was unlikely that I would be operating any trains. They also took fingerprints.
So I started for C&NW the first part of February, 1980 at 400 West Madison Street in Chicago.
Friday, September 01, 2006
Great Northern Empire Builder
I noticed on Walthers web site that the first of the new HO scale empire builder cars has arrived. Walthers is the distributer of these cars so it will take a few days for my pre-ordered car to arrive at Caboose Hobbies in Denver. Walthers is producing accurate models of the entire Great Northern Empire Builder. You can see their artwork here.
The actual full size train was made up of these cars but in some cases there was more than one of each type. For instance, there would have been 3 of the shorter dome cars and two of the 7-4-3-1 sleeper cars and two of the 6-5-2 sleeper cars. The entire train could have been 18 cars! That’s too long for my HO layout so I’m going to make mine 10 cars:
1. Baggage-Dormitory
2. 60-Seat Coach
4. 48-Seat Vista Dome Coach
3. 48-Seat Vista Dome Coach
5. Ranch Coffee Shop Lounge
6. "Lake" Series Diner
7. Full Length Great Dome
8. “River" Series 7-4-3-1 Sleeper
9. "Pass" Series 6-5-2 Sleeper
10. “Coulee" Series 6-4-1 Observation
I might add a plain baggage car if the one they are going to release late in 2007 matches this train (it's not part of the set).
The Empire Builder was a Great Northern train. You can read all about it on this web site. The train ran between Chicago and Seattle. However, the Great Northern Railway only went as far east as St. Paul, Minnesota. The train was operated by the Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy between there and Chicago. Since it is this part of the route that I am going to base my model on, my train will be pulled by silver Burlington engines rather than the attractive Great Northern engines shown in the Walthers page.
I acquired a Burlington E7A and an E8A several years ago to pull a model of the California Zephyr. These are Life Like Proto 2000 models. I hadn’t run them for a long time in favor of other models but recently dug them out in preparation for the arrival of the Empire Builder cars. I got motivated to add some additional detailing to them.
Here is a picture of the E7A number 9924A:

Here is a picture of the E8A number 9941B:

These models were very detailed right out of the box. The extra details that I have added so far make them stand out even more. Mostly what I did was add additional grab irons on the cab, nose and roof. There is a lot more that can still be done.
Information about proper placement of these details can be found in various publications and web sites. For instance, here is a link to a picture of the full size 9941B.
It is also interesting to notice how this railroad was inconsistent in its paint schemes. For instance, notice the difference in the color and number of stripes on the front of the locomotives.
Many of the Burlington E7’s and E8’s had their side frames replaced with stainless steel the entire length of the locomotive behind the cab. These two never had that done.
I am looking forward to completing my Empire Builder. Unfortunately, it wall take almost a year since the cars are being release about one per month.
The actual full size train was made up of these cars but in some cases there was more than one of each type. For instance, there would have been 3 of the shorter dome cars and two of the 7-4-3-1 sleeper cars and two of the 6-5-2 sleeper cars. The entire train could have been 18 cars! That’s too long for my HO layout so I’m going to make mine 10 cars:
1. Baggage-Dormitory
2. 60-Seat Coach
4. 48-Seat Vista Dome Coach
3. 48-Seat Vista Dome Coach
5. Ranch Coffee Shop Lounge
6. "Lake" Series Diner
7. Full Length Great Dome
8. “River" Series 7-4-3-1 Sleeper
9. "Pass" Series 6-5-2 Sleeper
10. “Coulee" Series 6-4-1 Observation
I might add a plain baggage car if the one they are going to release late in 2007 matches this train (it's not part of the set).
The Empire Builder was a Great Northern train. You can read all about it on this web site. The train ran between Chicago and Seattle. However, the Great Northern Railway only went as far east as St. Paul, Minnesota. The train was operated by the Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy between there and Chicago. Since it is this part of the route that I am going to base my model on, my train will be pulled by silver Burlington engines rather than the attractive Great Northern engines shown in the Walthers page.
I acquired a Burlington E7A and an E8A several years ago to pull a model of the California Zephyr. These are Life Like Proto 2000 models. I hadn’t run them for a long time in favor of other models but recently dug them out in preparation for the arrival of the Empire Builder cars. I got motivated to add some additional detailing to them.
Here is a picture of the E7A number 9924A:

Here is a picture of the E8A number 9941B:

These models were very detailed right out of the box. The extra details that I have added so far make them stand out even more. Mostly what I did was add additional grab irons on the cab, nose and roof. There is a lot more that can still be done.
Information about proper placement of these details can be found in various publications and web sites. For instance, here is a link to a picture of the full size 9941B.
It is also interesting to notice how this railroad was inconsistent in its paint schemes. For instance, notice the difference in the color and number of stripes on the front of the locomotives.
Many of the Burlington E7’s and E8’s had their side frames replaced with stainless steel the entire length of the locomotive behind the cab. These two never had that done.
I am looking forward to completing my Empire Builder. Unfortunately, it wall take almost a year since the cars are being release about one per month.
Wednesday, August 30, 2006
The Denver Zephyr
The Denver Zephyr was the Burlington’s top Chicago to Denver train. It was the main competition to the C&NW / UP City of Denver. It’s overall schedule was almost identical in 1950 as shown below. It traveled the route at an average speed of 63 mph. | |||||
Station | Leave | Total Miles | Miles | Minutes | Avg Speed |
Chicago | 5:00 PM | ||||
Galesburg, IL | 7:07 PM | 162 | 162 | 127 | 77 |
Burlington, IA | 7:51 PM | 206 | 44 | 44 | 60 |
Ottumwa, IA | 8:56 PM | 280 | 74 | 65 | 68 |
Creston, IA | 10:42 PM | 393 | 113 | 106 | 64 |
Council Bluffs, IA | 12:08 AM | 492 | 99 | 86 | 69 |
Omaha, NE | 12:30 AM | 496 | 4 | 22 | 11 |
Lincoln, NE | 1:45 AM | 551 | 55 | 75 | 44 |
Hastings, NE | 3:23 AM | 648 | 97 | 98 | 59 |
Holdrege, NE | 4:12 AM | 702 | 54 | 49 | 66 |
McCook, NE | 5:32 AM | 779 | 77 | 82 | 56 |
Akron, CO | 6:40 AM | 922 | 143 | 128 | 67 |
Fort Morgan, CO | 7:13 AM | 956 | 34 | 33 | 62 |
Denver, CO | 8:30 AM | 1034 | 78 | 77 | 61 |
Today, Amtrak’s California Zephyr is the only train to run between Chicago and Denver. Its schedule is shown below. It is a bit slower but not all that much – at least when it is on time. It travels the route at an average speed of 56 mph. Not all Amtrak stops are included. They stop at more places than the Denver Zephyr did. They also eliminated a couple of stops. | |||||
Station | Leave | Total Miles | Miles | Minutes | Avg Speed |
Chicago | 1:50 PM | ||||
Galesburg, IL | 4:28 PM | 162 | 162 | 158 | 62 |
Burlington, IA | 5:15 PM | 206 | 44 | 47 | 56 |
Ottumwa, IA | 6:43 PM | 280 | 74 | 88 | 50 |
Creston, IA | 8:31 PM | 393 | 113 | 108 | 63 |
Omaha, NE | 10:19 PM | 496 | 103 | 108 | 57 |
Lincoln, NE | 12:18 AM | 551 | 55 | 119 | 28 |
Hastings, NE | 1:57 AM | 648 | 97 | 99 | 59 |
Holdrege, NE | 2:44 AM | 702 | 54 | 47 | 69 |
McCook, NE | 3:53 AM | 779 | 77 | 69 | 67 |
Fort Morgan, CO | 5:15 AM | 956 | 177 | 138 | 77 |
Denver, CO | 7:30 AM | 1034 | 78 | 135 | 35 |
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
C&NW Passenger Trains
Unfortunately, I think, a lot of the most interesting railroads have been merged out of existence into a handful of mega railroads. For instance, the current Union Pacific Railroad consists of the old original Union Pacific plus Chicago and North Western, Missouri Pacific, Missouri-Kansas-Texas, Western Pacific, Southern Pacific, and Denver and Rio Grande Western. These railroads include numerous other railroads as well. | |||||
My original and current favorite is the Chicago and North Western. It’s because I grew up near the C&NW mainline in the Chicago area and it has a rich history of passenger trains. I also worked for them for a couple of years in the early 1980’s. | |||||
The C&NW has a long history that goes back more than 150 years. When it was absorbed into Union Pacific in 1995, it was one of the oldest companies in the United States. How many companies can you think of that still exist that are over 150 years old an still operate with the same name as 150 years ago? | |||||
The C&NW line that went west out to Omaha, Nebraska was the host of many famous passenger trains that originated in Chicago including the “City” trains that were operated in conjunction with Union Pacific: City of Los Angeles, City of San Francisco, City of Portland, City of Denver. There were also trains like the Pacific Limited (Chicago to LA), San Francisco Challenger, San Francisco Overland Limited, Los Angeles Challenger, Los Angeles Overland Limited, The Columbine (to Denver), The Portland Rose, The Forty Niner (to San Francisco). They also had trains that went north and northwest to Wisconsin and Minnesota. Trains like The 400, The Viking, The Victory, and the North Western Limited. These were the "big" and famous trains on the C&NW. There were lots of other trains that had names and many that had only numbers. | |||||
Not a single one of these trains made it to the Amtrak era. And, I never saw a single one of the big named trains other than in pictures. | |||||
So I have a model of one of them using Walthers’ passenger cars and Proto 2000 E6, E7 and E8 locomotives. | |||||
In February of 1950, the westbound City of Denver, train 111, had the schedule shown below. The train was turned over to Union Pacific in Omaha. The train had an overall average speed of 64 mph for the 1048 mile run from Chicago to Denver. This was one of the faster Chicago to Denver trains in 1950. | |||||
Station | Leave | Total Miles | Miles | Minutes | Avg Speed |
Chicago | 5:00 PM | ||||
Sterling, IL | 6:37 PM | 110 | 110 | 97 | 68 |
Clinton, IA | 7:04 PM | 138 | 28 | 27 | 62 |
Cedar Rapids, IA | 8:15 PM | 219 | 81 | 71 | 68 |
Marshalltown, IA | 9:18 PM | 289 | 70 | 63 | 67 |
Ames, IA | 9:51 PM | 327 | 38 | 33 | 69 |
Boone, IA | 10:10 PM | 340 | 13 | 19 | 41 |
Council Bluffs, IA | 12:17 AM | 485 | 145 | 127 | 69 |
Omaha, NE | 12:30 AM | 488 | 3 | 13 | 14 |
Columbus, NE | 1:55 AM | 570 | 82 | 85 | 58 |
Grand Island, NE | 2:50 AM | 632 | 62 | 55 | 68 |
Kearney, NE | 3:28 AM | 674 | 42 | 38 | 66 |
North Platte, NE | 4:47 AM | 769 | 95 | 79 | 72 |
Julesburg, CO | 5:00 AM | 851 | 82 | 73 | 67 |
Sterling, CO | 5:55 AM | 908 | 57 | 55 | 62 |
La Salle, CO | 7:20 AM | 1001 | 93 | 85 | 66 |
Denver, CO | 8:30 AM | 1048 | 47 | 70 | 40 |
Sunday, August 27, 2006
Railfanning August 27, 2006
Spent a good part of today railfanning the Moffat subdivision of the Union Pacific. Here is a picture of Amtrak’s California Zephyr running at least 2 hours late. This photo was taken at Crescent, one of the sidings that the trains encounter on their way up to the Moffat Tunnel. The equipment on this train has seen better days. Some corrosion and flaking paint. I hope they are in better condition inside.

There were some nice freights up there too such as this coal train also at Crescent.

I saw several of these coal trains. Most were empties but one was loaded.
Up at the Moffat Tunnel, it was 50 degrees compared to 73 back down in Denver. I walked a little ways up the trail that begins here and ends up at Arapaho Lakes about 7 miles away. I just went around to the backside of the tunnel portal to see what I could see. While I was there, the tunnel’s ventilation fan was operating. It’s quite noisy and runs 20 minutes or so until the tunnel is ventilated. They do this after each train runs through in order to avoid breathing problems for the railroad personnel. The Moffat Tunnel is about 6 miles long and comes out at Winter Park on the other side of the Continental Divide. No train came through the tunnel while I was there.
I drove up the old Rollins Pass road about a half mile. The road is in as bad of shape as ever. Lots of pot holes and rocks. Nice view of the railroad leading to the tunnel though. This road was the railroad itself before the tunnel was completed in 1927. You can read my story of cycling up Rollins pass if you'd like.

There were some nice freights up there too such as this coal train also at Crescent.

I saw several of these coal trains. Most were empties but one was loaded.
Up at the Moffat Tunnel, it was 50 degrees compared to 73 back down in Denver. I walked a little ways up the trail that begins here and ends up at Arapaho Lakes about 7 miles away. I just went around to the backside of the tunnel portal to see what I could see. While I was there, the tunnel’s ventilation fan was operating. It’s quite noisy and runs 20 minutes or so until the tunnel is ventilated. They do this after each train runs through in order to avoid breathing problems for the railroad personnel. The Moffat Tunnel is about 6 miles long and comes out at Winter Park on the other side of the Continental Divide. No train came through the tunnel while I was there.
I drove up the old Rollins Pass road about a half mile. The road is in as bad of shape as ever. Lots of pot holes and rocks. Nice view of the railroad leading to the tunnel though. This road was the railroad itself before the tunnel was completed in 1927. You can read my story of cycling up Rollins pass if you'd like.
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Along the Joint Line 1
Here is a set of locomotives that are often seen south of Denver doing switching duties at various industries. It's an interesting set because the three are quite different looking with three different heritages. This photo was taken on August 23, 2006.

The Rio Grande engine is a GP40-2 with 3000 horsepower. It has been renumbered via a patch to Union Pacific 1348. It used to have Rio Grande number 3126 and was built in 1974.
The Cotton Belt engine has also been patched by Union Pacific to number 1526. This engine was originally built as a GP40 in 1967. It had a series of owners and numbers beginning with Louisville and Nashville 3024, then Seaboard 6820, then CSX 6820. Then Cotton Belt got it and numbered it 7291. It was rebuilt in 1991 into what the railroad calls a GP40-2M. It has 3000 horsepower.
The Union Pacific 1924 engine is a GP60 that was built in 1988 as Cotton Belt 9622. It used to look a lot like the Cotton Belt engine in the photo. It spent about a year as Union Pacific 5724 before getting the number shown here. GP60's have 3800 horsepower.

The Rio Grande engine is a GP40-2 with 3000 horsepower. It has been renumbered via a patch to Union Pacific 1348. It used to have Rio Grande number 3126 and was built in 1974.
The Cotton Belt engine has also been patched by Union Pacific to number 1526. This engine was originally built as a GP40 in 1967. It had a series of owners and numbers beginning with Louisville and Nashville 3024, then Seaboard 6820, then CSX 6820. Then Cotton Belt got it and numbered it 7291. It was rebuilt in 1991 into what the railroad calls a GP40-2M. It has 3000 horsepower.
The Union Pacific 1924 engine is a GP60 that was built in 1988 as Cotton Belt 9622. It used to look a lot like the Cotton Belt engine in the photo. It spent about a year as Union Pacific 5724 before getting the number shown here. GP60's have 3800 horsepower.
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
Where Were Those Trains Going?
I remember vividly right after going to bed hearing the sound of trains going through Lombard. Our house was about 4 blocks from the tracks where there were frequent trains. There was always a train going by when I was too far away to see what sort of train it was. They did not often blow their horns through Lombard and the other western suburbs. Lombard was a bedroom community and people were aware of the need to be cautious by these high speed tracks. But especially late at night, you could hear the trains anyway. It was the sound of the diesel locomotives and the sound of the train’s wheels hitting the joints in the still-jointed tracks. I could tell if it was just another commuter train heading out to West Chicago or Geneva or towards Chicago. The sound of the F7’s and E8’s were distinctive and recognizable because of the sound of their acceleration away from the Lombard station. Freight trains were different because they made a steady sound with little or no acceleration. They might have had their terminus as close as Proviso Yard about 10 miles east or they might have gone all the way into Chicago. They also could have gone to any number of far away points west but most often to Omaha where the train would be turned over to the Union Pacific to go even farther west – even as far as California.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)